How much importance do we place on sound reinforcement?
How many churches place adequate emphasis on training sound engineers who are so vitally important (and often unsung heroes)?



What are the common mistakes that you have witnessed that could be improved with better training and planning?

For example, I don't know how many times I have seen a church leader stand before a congregation and speak into a "dead" microphone.  The delay in response time in un-muting the microphone can seem like an eternity to me, as I always emphasize the importance of smooth flow.

For that matter, it seems we should also be training Scripture readers and prayer leaders how to speak directly into the microphone to properly amplify them.

Does your sound system adequately and clearly work for your needs?

For those who use video in the assembly, do you ever experience glitches when the video is playing but the audio is not?  (This has often embarrassed even the biggest conferences and gatherings.)

How about the mix levels of the song leader?  Is he blairringly loud?

The mixing levels become even more complicated when amplifying multiple singers.  Do individual voices stand out in the mix?  Does the volume level of the support singers unintentionally discourage congregants from participating in the singing?  (Some may think, "Since I can't hear myself or those nearby, might as well just listen" or, "They are so loud, I'll just enjoy hearing the talented singers.")  Potentially, a lot can ride on the skills of the audio engineer.

What about sound checks?
Is the sound person given enough notification of the order of worship and the complete plan?

Of course, I have raised issues that are wider than just the scope of sound reinforcement, but it is safe to say this area plays an important role in our assemblies.

How much training does your church offer to the technical support team?
Do these servants feel appreciated?
What are your thoughts and experiences?